Skip to main content
Experience

The Conseil québécois de la transformation de la volaille challenges a by-law applicable to the production of chicken

Fasken
Reading Time 2 minute read
Share
  • LinkedIn

Overview

Client

Conseil quebecois de la transformation de la volaille

Fasken successfully represented the Conseil québécois de la transformation de la volaille (CQTV) before the Québec Agricultural and Food Marketing Board (the “Board”).

As part of its mission, the Board act as a regulation agency to approve by-laws applicable to particular productions.

Fasken represents the CQTV in its challenge of a by-law applicable to the production of chicken that limits the quota of production per person on the basis that the by-law produces only academic effects for many large informal associations of farmers who unofficially pool their resources. As such, the by-law is in reality only affecting some members of the CQTV.

In order to make its argument, the CQTV produced an expert report based on confidential interviews, that identified dozens of those informal associations of farmers who, if considered as one entity, would hold too many quotas.

The decision rendered by the Board was about the right of the Farmers Association to obtain the raw data used by the expert to make its determination. The Board concluded that an interested party had no right to obtain raw data used in an expert report when the report was used by the Board in its capacity of regulator.

A Fasken team composed of Antoine Aylwin and Guillaume Pelegrin represented the Conseil québécois de la transformation de la volaille in connection with this case.

Jurisdiction

  • Québec

Team

  • Guillaume Pelegrin, Partner | Litigation and Dispute Resolution, Montréal, QC, +1 514 397 7411, gpelegrin@fasken.com

    You might be interested in...

    • Luik v. Niagara-on-the-Lake (Town) 2020 CanLII 10061 (ON LPAT), [Case - Niagara Parks Commission], Sarah successfully represented the Niagara Parks Commission as a statutory commenting agency in respect of this development and severance application.
    • Sleep Number Corporation v. Maher Sign Products Inc. 2020 ONCA 95, [Case - Sleep Number Corporation], Successfully represented Sleep Number Corporation in obtaining a favourable Ontario court of appeal decision regarding the enforcement of a U.S. judgment.
    • Vivekanandan v. Terzian (Ont. C.A.) 443 DLR (4th) 678, [Case - Vivekanandan/Azargive], This appeal discusses an evolution in the test of “reasonable necessity” in the context of a prescriptive easement.  The court of appeal found that the application judge failed to determine whether alleged easement was “reasonably necessary” to better enjoyment of alleged dominant tenement.  Hist...